Architectural Practice_2040
I,
after more than 20 years of experience working in the field of architecture,
would be practicing architecture by setting up my own firm. Hoping to get the
hold of the profession and the business of practicing architecture by then, I
would my in the middle of my career and having a stability at work.
For the duration of this essay, AP stands for the
architectural firm registered by me and another partner as owners.
AP
will be a small firm with maximum 4 partners, all with diverse expertise and
interest. There will be other levels of designers, Structural consultants, MEP
consultant, legal advisor, draftsman, visualizers associated with the firm.
The
office will be a hopefully virtual existence rather than a physical
amalgamation of these mentioned people. The firm would mostly function and work
through a server. Only the designing work would be taken care of the core
people of AP. Rest work would either be outsourced to trusted teams or done by
part time members. Hiring all the people and maintaining an office will not be
a favourable option. The services of the structural engineer, legal advisors or
draftsman can be rendered as and when required.
This
web dependent office practice would give us the flexibility of work timings and
our locations of stay. I would probably be staying in some third tier cities
with less polluted and less crowed environment. The core team even may have the
freedom to stay at different parts of the country with some anchor points like
permanent office space in some metropolis like Delhi.
AP
will be taking up housing, institutional building, transport infrastructures,
community spaces of these third tier cities or smaller towns. At those time
period, developing those places would be very important to limit the population
increase in the mega cities and keep a balance between those cities and smaller
towns or villages. These growth of this middle layer of settlements would be
necessity to balance this densifying of few cities. AP’s target clients and
target locations will be these places.
These
developments will be complex in their own ways and solutions for these site
have to be very localised and unique. This could be managed by having diverse
knowledge for the partners and architects and collaborating with other firms.
Projects would gain if solved and worked in a collaboration and in a consortium
of firms with multidisciplinary background.
The
work culture will of AP will be as it is in practice now in other architectural
firms of this scale. For this sale of firm with around 10 members and working
together without being physically present in a same building have many
benefits. The work won’t get hampered for any office related problems. The time
wasted in travel and the hassle of living in an overly crowded city and health
problems related to this won’t be there. The flexibility of time and working
environment enhances production and increases creativity.
All
these will work assuming that the technology will become more advanced and make
teleconference, data storage and security more easy and simplified by then for
companies to function in the virtual platform. The copyright of architectural
data and the security of the designs will be an issue to question, which can be
solved by IT advancements by 2040.
This
is my business plan to practice architecture.
RFP/ Tender Review
Tenders
read:
1. Development of Smart Campus
for IT/ITES in Madhya Pradesh
2. GAME Tower at GAME City, Hyderabad
Knowledge City
3. T Hub (Phase-II) at GAME City,
Hyderabad Knowledge City
The
selection of architects is done by this process:
1. Sale of tender documents
2. Submission of Technical bid
and Financial bids by eligible architects with deposit of document fee and EMB.
3. Opening of technical bids and
presentation in front of screening committee
4. Opening of financial bids of
selected architects
5. Award of contract to the most
suited firm by evaluation in 60:40 manner (60 technical score: 40 financial
score)
The
eligibility for participating in the bid was to have 10 years or more of
practicing experience. This criteria filters the kind of firms which can apply
to only well set up firm. Fresh firms cannot participate and which misses the
young talent from the project.
The
technical bid contains the design proposal and the work history and
qualifications of the firm. The evaluation process of the firm is also laid in
the RFP document. The time to prepare the technical bid after the issue of the
tender is around 2 weeks which is too low to prepare an informed design
proposal. The architects are required to visit the site and collect site
related data before bidding. 2 weeks are
less for all this process.
Also
in the 60 marks allotted for the technical bid, only 10 is given for the
architectural design proposal. Rest goes for the experience of the firm,
turnover of the firm, qualification of key people related to the project. This
kind of evaluation makes and marks distribution makes no sense after the
eligibility criteria is set for 10years or more of experience. Eligibility vs. evaluation criteria?
This
has a major flaw in marking as a firm with more experience and huge turnover
can get the project in spite of having a bad score in design as the weightage
is very less. Why low weightage for
design proposal?
Also
the deposit of huge money like 6 lacs for 300cr projects in the case of last
two tenders by all the bidders and then returning back to all the unsuccessful
bidders is transaction of huge amount unnecessarily. What is the use of EMD?
This
process of selecting of architects gives more importance of the architecture
firm as a brand than the proposal made for the particular case for which the
tender is issued.
Does following this system
beats good design in front of well setup firms?
Architectural Competition Review
Call
for entries of competitions studied:
1.
Twin Museum
and Auditorium at Visva Bharati
2.
Nalanda
University
3.
Redefining
homes
The
process for architectural competitions followed are:
Stage
1: Request for Expression of Interest (EOI)
Stage
2: Request for Proposals (RFP)
Call
for entries or EOI are issued by the clients. This stage filters the applicants
on the basis of their experience, fees received, and work completed for related
kind of buildings.
After
this stage a detailed RPF document is provided to selected firms.
The
other type is single stage competition which was adopted for the Nalanda
University.
A
jury panel is appointed to judge and select the winner of the competition among
the shortlisted entries. The marking criteria is mostly on design proposals and
this ensures that the most deserved design gets the contract.
Theses
competitions were free to enter and there were monetary prizes for top three
winners. Which gives firms much more reasons to invest in competitions. The
eligibility of firms done works earlier on same kind of project restricts new
firms to participate.
Organising
competition ensures that the best design is selected without looking into the
firm’s history or experiences after setting a minimal filtering criteria.
THE ARCHITECTS ACT OF 1972- Interpretation of clauses
1. Clause 4: this clause of the act talks about the temporary vacancy in the council.
If a post in the Council of the Architecture gets vacated before the end of the term, fresh election or nomination will take place to appoint a member to fill that post for the rest of the term. Once the term is finished and the new terms starts, again a new member will be elected through the election.
2. Clause 12: Clause 12 states some o the powers of the council to elect their members.
As per the act the council may appoint a Registrar who may act like a Secretary and a Treasurer if needed and if the council decides so. In order to carry out the function as mentioned in the Act properly, the council is free to appoint some other officers and employees. From the previous amount of money received from Central Government, the council is bound to fix the pay, the allowances and other services for the employees and officers of the council
No comments:
Post a Comment